Every month Workforce Management magazine gives you the HR trends and tools that help you deliver measurable business results for your company. Subscribe today!
Current Edition
Features
-
The Last Word: Emails, We Get Emails
There has been a lot of chatter lately about the clutter email adds to our professional and personal lives. Some say the torrent of emails is merely an annoying distraction, a product of life in the 21st century workplace; others contend an overflowing inbox is downright unhealthy.
-
The Dream, the Reality: Civil Rights in the '60s and Today
To celebrate Workforce Management's 90th anniversary, we're running a series of articles looking at important workforce-related issues with a then-and-now theme. This installment examines civil rights in the 1960s and today. Next month, we look at the 1970s and women in the workforce.
-
It's About Time—and Money
Workforce management technology has come a long way from time clocks. Today's tools can save—or cost—companies millions. And thanks to a new group, the once-frumpy field is coming into fashion.
Out Front
-
The Hot List: 2012 HRMS Providers
Workforce Management, May 2012, p. 20Subscribe Now!
-
Data Bank Focus: Hires vs. Unemployed Workers
While the national unemployment level has slowly fallen from its peak of 10 percent in 2009, the number of unemployed people far outdistances the number of hires. Just how dire the situation is today can be seen by comparing the size of the gaps for the two most recent recessions.
-
Data Bank Focus: The Rising Perils of Unemployment
During the past decade, the time it takes to find a job has slowly increased for the unemployed. In 2000, more than half of all unemployed people were able to find a job in fewer than five weeks; last year only about a third found new employment as fast.
-
Data Bank Focus: Worker Productivity, Employment and Compensation
United States labor productivity has continued to increase since 2001 with a positive change year over year. Although productivity is a function of labor and might be expected to grow or shrink in parallel with changes in employment levels, in several years, productivity increased even as employment fell.
